Economical and Structural Feasibility of Concrete Cellular and Solid Blocks in Kurdistan Region

Dilan M. Rostam, Taghreed K.M. Ali, Dawood S.S. Atrushi

Abstract


Cellular concrete blocks are the major building materials in Kurdistan Region in Iraq. This study is carried out to check the economical and structural feasibility. The integrity of the blocks as well as its industrial production process compared with local and international standards. Recommendations for the concrete block production have been given in this paper. Samples from 10 local factories of total 60 blocks have been collected and tested at Koya University Laboratory. The carried out tests covered the dimensions, compression strength and water absorption of the samples. The results of this research study were compared with the requirements of the Iraqi and European specifications. They showed that the products of all factories do not fulfil the specified requirements. The dimensions of specimens exhibited relatively high deviations with no recommended tolerances for dimensions of the blocks. The results analysis showed that the weight of the 400x200x200mm block size was about 20-23 kg and the size of the represented voids was about 60% of the volume. This study made some regulatory recommendations to standardise the concrete block production in the region.

Keywords


Building standard codes, cellular concrete block, eurocode, structural feasibility.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ahmad, R., Malik, M.I., Jan, M.U., Ahmad, P., Seth, H. and Ahmad, J., 2014. Brick Masonry and Hollow Concrete Block Masonry – A Comparative Study, International Journal of Civil and Structural Engineering Research (IJCSER), 1(1), pp.14-21.

Barbosa, C., Lourenço, P. and Hanai, J., 2010. On the compressive strength prediction for concrete masonry prisms. Materials and Structures, 43(3), pp.331-344.

Cavette, C., 2007. How concrete block is made - material, manufacture, used, components, structure, steps, machine. [Online] Available at: http://www.madehow.com/Volume-3/Concrete-Block.html [Accessed 17 Nov. 2015].

CBA UK, 2007. Aggregate Concrete Blocks, A Guide to Selection & Specification; Cellular Blocks, Concrete Block Association, [online] Available at: http://www.thakeham.co.uk/images/upload/docum/Block%20Selector.pdf [Accessed 2 Nov. 2015].

CBA UK, 2008. Understanding BS EN 771-3: Aggregate concrete masonry units, [online] Available at: http://www.cba-blocks.org.uk/downloads/CBA%

Understanding%20EN%20771%2009.pdf [Accessed 17 Nov. 2015].

CCI, 2011. How to make concrete bricks and blocks, midrand, South Africa, [online] Available at: http://www.afrisam.co.za/media/13734/how_to_make_

concrete_bricks_and_blocks.pdf [Accessed 20 Sep. 2015].

Chandra, D. and Bhise, N., 1994. Solid concrete block masonry scheme. Roorkee, India: Central Building Research Institute, [online] Available at: http://krc.cbri.res.in/dspace/bitstream/123456789/264/1/BRN69.pdf [Accessed 17 Nov. 2015].

Collins, M., 2015. Concrete Technology & Construction, The Concrete Society, [online] Ict.concrete.org.uk. Available at:

http://ict.concrete.org.uk/exams/qualifications.asp [Accessed 17 Nov. 2015].

DeVekey, R.C., 2001. Bricks, blocks and masonry made from aggregate concrete: performance requirements, BRE Centre for Whole Life Construction and Conservation, BRE Digest 460 Part 1.

GOI (Government of India), 2012. Techno economic feasibility report on concrete hollow & solid block, Building Materials and Technology PromotionCouncil Ministry of Housing & Urban Poverty Alleviation Government of India, New Delhi

Hornbostel, C., 1991. Construction Materials, 2nd Edition, John Wiley and Sons, Inc.

Iraqi Standard Specification (ISS), 1987. ISS No. 1077, Load-Bearing Concrete Masonry Units,

Johannessen, B., 2008. Building rural roads, chapter 12, 1st ed., Bangkok, Thailand: ILO.

Kishore, E.K., 2011. Testing of Concrete Blocks. [Online] Available at: http://www.engineeringcivil.com/testing-of-concrete-blocks.html [Accessed 2 Nov. 2015].

Koski, J.A., 1992. How Concrete Block Are Made, Masonry Construction, pp.374-377.

Kosmatka, S.H., Kerkhoff, B., and Panarese, W.C., 2003. Design and control of concrete mixtures EB001, 14 edn., Skokie, Illinois, USA: Portland Cement Association.

Neville, A.M., 1996. Properties of Concrete. (4th ed.). England: Wiley.

Pluijm, R.V.D., 2009. EUROCODE 6 Design of masonry structures, Dissemination of information for training – Brussels, 2-3 April 2009 [online] Available at: http://eurocodes.jrc.ec.europa.eu/doc/WS2009/2_6_Pluijm.pdf [Accessed 17 Aug. 2015].

Siram, K.K.B., 2012. Cellular Lightweight Concrete Blocks as a Replacement of Burnt Clay Bricks, International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology (IJEAT), ISSN: 2249–8958, 2(2).

Sturgeon, G., 2013. Metric Technical Manual. 16th ed. [ebook] CCMPA, Region 6 of the National Concrete Masonry Association, p.Chapter 4. Available at: http://www.ccmpa.ca/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/Final2013 Sec4.pdf [Accessed 1 Jul. 2015].

Zhang, S. and Zong, L., 2014. Evaluation of Relationship between Water Absorption and Durability of Concrete Materials. Advances in Materials Science and Engineering, 2014, pp.1-8.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14500/aro.10113
View Counter: Abstract | 1607 | and PDF | 660 |

Article Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Metrics powered by PLOS ALM

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2016 Dilan M. Rostam, Taghreed K.M. Ali, Dawood S.S. Atrushi

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

  
 


ARO Journal is an OAJ supported by Koya University, it has no article submission/processing charges (APCs).
© 2018, Koya University is a public University accredited by the Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research, KRG - F.R. Iraq.