Influence of Patient Size and Photon Energies on IMRT Plans for Localized Prostate Cancer
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14500/aro.12243Keywords:
Dosimetric analysis, Intensity-modulated radiation therapy, Patient size, Photon energy, Prostate cancer, Radiotherapy planningAbstract
The localized prostate cancer treatment with intensitymodulated radiation therapy (IMRT) produces precise radiation doses that protect healthy tissues but continues to generate toxicity in the bladder and rectum. Our study aims to evaluate how patient size and photon energy influence IMRT plan quality in localized prostate cancer. Patients with localized prostate cancer (n = 20) received IMRT treatment in a retrospective analysis through two groups (small n = 12 and large n = 8) based on planning target volume isocenter diameter measurements. The same planning objectives guided the build of 6 MV and 10 MV photon plans for each patient. The assessment included monitor units (MUs) as well as examination of homogeneity index and conformity index, and dose–volume histogram metrics when comparing different energies and patient size groups. The target coverage and dose uniformity between 6 MV and 10 MV were equivalent, but 10 MV plans cut down MUs by 6.6% in a small group. The size of patients played a stronger influence on organs at risk (OAR) than energy utilization during treatment planning. Large patients received 22% lower mean bladder doses, 30% lower bladder V10–V50 values, and 3396% (6 MV) less V20–V50 doses in the left femoral head compared to smaller patients. The size of the patient influenced OAR sparing more than the selection of photon energy, which had limited and size‐dependent effects. Therefore, patient size has to be considered in energy choice, treatment planning, and clinical trial design to individualize treatment and minimize toxicity.
Downloads
References
Kry, S.F., Salehpour, M., Followill, D.S., Stovall, M., Kuban, D.A., Allen White, R., and Rosen, I.I., 2005. Out-of-field photon and neutron dose equivalents from step-and-shoot intensity-modulated radiation therapy. International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics, 62(4), pp.1204-1216.
Lin, J., Zhan, X., Chen, R., Chen, R., Jiang, M., Li, Y., Liu, X., Chen, G., and Fu, B., 2023. Increased burden of second bladder cancer and rectal cancer in prostate cancer treated with radiotherapy: Results from surveillance, epidemiology, and end results. Cancer Control, 30, p.10732748231177544.
Mohammed, B.N., Ismail, A.H., and Tahir, E.M., 2025. Assessment of leakage radiation and radiobiological impacts in gamma knife radiosurgery: Dosimetric and biological analysis. ARO-The Scientific Journal of Koya University, 13(1), pp.284-290.
Morgan, S.C., Hoffman, K., Andrew Loblaw, D., Buyyounouski, M.K., Patton, C., Barocas, D., Bentzen, S., Chang, M., Efstathiou, J., Greany, P., Halvorsen, P., Koontz, B.F., Lawton, C., Marc Leyrer, C., Lin, D., Ray, M., and Sandler, H., 2018. Hypofractionated radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer: An ASTRO, ASCO, and AUA evidence-based guideline. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 36(34), pp.3411-3430.
Mottet, N., van den Bergh, R.C.N., Briers, E., Van den Broeck, T., Cumberbatch, M.G., De Santis, M., Fanti, S., Fossati, N., Gandaglia, G., Gillessen, S., Grivas, N., Grummet, J., Henry, A.M.,… & Cornford, P., 2021.
EAU-EANM-ESTRO-ESUR-SIOG guidelines on prostate cancer-2020 update. Part 1: Screening, diagnosis, and local treatment with curative intent. European Urology, 79(2), pp.243-262.
Mukherjee, K., Small, W. and Duszak, R., 2022, Trends and variations in utilization and costs of radiotherapy for prostate cancer: A SEER medicare analysis from 2007 through 2016. Brachytherapy, 21(1), pp.12-21.
Pirzkall, A., Carol, M.P., Pickett, B., Xia, P., Roach, M. 3rd., and Verhey, L.J., 2002. The effect of beam energy and number of fields on photon-based IMRT for deep-seated targets. International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics, 53(2), pp.434-442.
Pryor, D.I., Turner, S.L., Tai, K.H., Tang, C., Sasso, G., Dreosti, M., Woo, H.H., Wilton, L., and Martin, J.M., 2018. Moderate hypofractionation for prostate cancer: A user’s guide. Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology, 62(2), pp.232-239.
Ratosa, I., Jenko, A., and Oblak, I., 2018. Breast size impact on adjuvant radiotherapy adverse effects and dose parameters in treatment planning. Radiology and Oncology, 52(3), pp.233-244.
Raychaudhuri, R., Lin, D.W., and Montgomery, R.B., 2025. Prostate cancer: A review. JAMA, 33(10), pp.1433-1446.
Schafer, E.J., Laversanne, M., Sung, H., Soerjomataram, I., Briganti, A., Dahut, W., Bray, F., and Jemal, A., 2025. Recent patterns and trends in global prostate cancer incidence and mortality: An update. European Urology, 87(3), pp.302-313.
Sethi, A., Leo, P., Kabat, C., and Cecilio, P., 2013. SU-E-T-538: Validation of Monte Carlo Dose algorithm in heterogeneous medium. Medical Physics, 40(6Part19), pp.329-329.
Solaiappan, G., Singaravelu, G., Prakasarao, A., Rabbani, B., and Supe, S.S., 2009. Influence of photon beam energy on IMRT plan quality for radiotherapy of prostate cancer. Reports of Practical Oncology and Radiotherapy, 14(1), pp.18-31.
Stanley, D.N., Popp, T., Ha, C.S., Swanson, G.P., Eng, T.Y., Papanikolaou, N., and Gutiérrez, A.N., 2015. Dosimetric effect of photon beam energy on volumetric modulated arc therapy treatment plan quality due to body habitus in advanced prostate cancer. Practical Radiation Oncology, 5(6), pp.e625-e633.
Sung, W., Park, J.M., Choi, C.H., Ha, S.W., and Ye, S.J., 2012. The effect of photon energy on intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) plans for prostate cancer. Radiation Oncology Journal, 30(1), p.27-35.
RStudio Team (2022). RStudio: Integrated Development Environment for R. Boston, MA: RStudio, PBC. Available at: http://www.rstudio.com
Teo, M.Y., Rathkopf, D.E., and Kantoff, P., 2019. Treatment of advanced prostate cancer. Annual Review of Medicine, 70(1), pp.479-499.
Thangavelu, S., Jayakumar, S., Govindarajan, K.N., Supe, S.S., Nagarajan, V., and Nagarajan, M., 2011. Influence of photon energy on the quality of prostate intensity modulated radiation therapy plans based on analysis of physical indices. Journal of Medical Physics, 36(1), pp.29-34.
Webb, S., 2003. The physical basis of IMRT and inverse planning. The British Journal of Radiology, 76(910), pp.678-689.
Zhai, D.Y., Yin, Y., Gong, G.Z., Liu, T.H., Chen, J.H., Ma, C.S., and Lu, J., 2013. RapidArc radiotherapy for whole pelvic lymph node in cervical cancer with 6 and 15 MV: A treatment planning comparison with fixed field IMRT. Journal of Radiation Research, 54(1), pp.166-173.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Khabat A. Mohammed, Kharman A. Faraj

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who choose to publish their work with Aro agree to the following terms:
-
Authors retain the copyright to their work and grant the journal the right of first publication. The work is simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License [CC BY-NC-SA 4.0]. This license allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
-
Authors have the freedom to enter into separate agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work. This includes options such as posting it to an institutional repository or publishing it in a book, as long as proper acknowledgement is given to its initial publication in this journal.
-
Authors are encouraged to share and post their work online, including in institutional repositories or on their personal websites, both prior to and during the submission process. This practice can lead to productive exchanges and increase the visibility and citation of the published work.
By agreeing to these terms, authors acknowledge the importance of open access and the benefits it brings to the scholarly community.
Accepted 2025-08-03
Published 2025-09-23