Optimization of Wastewater Aeration Time in Decentralized Sequencing Batch Reactors in Duhok City, Iraq

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14500/aro.12487

Keywords:

Aeration optimization, BioWin, Decentralized wastewater treatment, Domestic wastewater, Sequencing batch reactor

Abstract

Aeration costs represent a significant portion of operational expenses (OPEX) in wastewater treatment facilities. Optimizing aeration time can enhance plant sustainability and also contribute to global CO2 reduction goals. However, research on aeration time optimization in full-scale decentralized Sequencing Batch Reactors (SBRs) remains limited. This study presents the first systematic application of BioWin to evaluate the impact of aeration time optimization on energy consumption, operational costs, and CO2 eemissions in full-scale decentralized SBR plants treating domestic wastewater. Operational, laboratory, and field data were used to
develop influent profiles and simulation models. BioWin’s simulation based results indicated that aeration in the equalization (EQ) basin is not required to meet Iraqi effluent standards and that bioreactor aeration times can be optimized without compromising treatment performance, indicating that existing SBR systems are over-aerated. Optimized aeration time resulted in 58.70% reductions in energy use, operating costs, and CO2 emissions, resulting in annual OPEX cost savings of 234,049,308 IQD and demonstrating that aeration time optimization is a practical and cost-effective approach for improving the sustainability of decentralized SBR plants.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Diler N. Hasan, Department of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, Duhok University, Duhok, Kurdistan Region – F.R. Iraq

Diler N. Hasan is a master's student at the College of Engineering at Department of Civil Engineering, University of Duhok (UoD), specializing in Environmental Engineering. His areas of interest include Environmental and Sanitary Engineering, Water and Wastewater Treatment, and Water Supply Engineering.

References

Abed, A., Wahab, B., and Salman, A., 2024. Estimating the carbon footprint of civil electrical diesel generators in Baghdad City. The Iraqi Geological Journal, 57, pp.138-148.

Altin, S., and Yildiz, A., 2025. A study on CO2 emissions of a small-scale port. Journal of Agroforestry and Environment, 18, pp.24-32.

Arbabi, M., Akbarzadeh, A., and Khodabakhshi, A., 2012. Optimization of SBR system for enhanced biological phosphorus and nitrogen removal. International Journal of Environmental Health Engineering, 1, p.49.

Barnard, J., 2001. Design and operational considerations for the largest SBR plant. Proceedings of the Water Environment Federation, 2001, pp.346-361.

Bianco, F., Giuliani, A., Martucci, I., Pucci, L., and Race, M., 2024. Comparing continuous and intermittent aeration using BioWin™ model simulation in a full-scale wastewater treatment plant. Journal of Water Process Engineering, 68, p.106530.

Bournazou, M.N.C., Hooshiar, K., Arellano-Garcia, H., Wozny, G., and Lyberatos, G., 2013. Model based optimization of the intermittent aeration profile for SBRs under partial nitrification. Water Research, 47, pp.3399-3410.

Briggs, C., Gilfillan, D., Hefner, M., Marland, E., and Marland, G., 2023. Annual estimates of global and national CO2 emissions from fossil fuels: Tracking revisions to the United Nations energy statistics database input energy data. Environmental Data Science, 2, p. e40.

Brown, J., Vaccari, C., and Vaccari David, A., 2023. Numerical optimization of wastewater treatment plant design for a high-nitrate industrial waste. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 149, p.04023087.

Chen, Z.M., Xie, W., and Zhang, H.Y., 2013. Study status and focus about CO2 from municipal wastewater treatment. Advanced Materials Research, 610-613, pp.1556-1559.

Cheng, H.H., Huang, P.W., and Whang, L.M., 2024. Optimization of biological nitrogen removal in full-scale municipal WWTPs using activated sludge model simulation. Chemosphere, 362, p.142939.

Duhok Sewerage, 2024. KRI. Investment Residential Projects Information. In: Planning. Duhok Sewerage Directorate, Duhok.

EPA, 2004. Local Limits Development Guidance (EPA 833-R-04-002A). United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Wastewater Management 4203. Available from: https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2015-10/documents/final_local_limits_guidance.pdf [Last accessed on 2025 Jul 17].

Insel, G., Sin, G., Lee, D., Nopens, I., and Vanrolleghem, P., 2006. A calibration methodology and model‐based systems analysis for SBRs removing nutrients under limited aeration conditions. Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology, 81, pp.679-687.

Ismael, S., and Aziz, S.Q., 2024. Solar energy application for erbil municipal wastewater treatment and reusing. Journal of Civil Engineering Researchers, 6, pp.49-59.

Izadi, P., Izadi, P., and Eldyasti, A., 2021. Enhancement of simultaneous nitrogen and phosphorus removal using intermittent aeration mechanism. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 109, pp.1-14.

Johannessen, E., Samstag, R., and Stensel, H.D., 2005. Effect of process configurations and alum addition on EBPR in membrane bioreactors. Proceedings of the Water Environment Federation, 2005, pp.5144-5166.

Kim, H., Hao, O.J., and Mcavoy, T.J., 2001. SBR system for phosphorus removal: Linear model based optimization. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 127, pp.105-111.

Kochary, S., Byl, T., and Noori, B., 2017. Modeling the movement of septic water chloride through a soil profile. Sustainability, 9, p.501.

Li, J., Tao, T., Li, X.B., Wang, L.M., and Zheng, H., 2013. Effect of anaerobic time on biological nitrogen removal in a modified SBR. Desalination and Water Treatment, 51, pp.3691-3699.

Li, X., Bao, D., Zhang, Y., Xu, W., Zhang, C., Yang, H., Ru, Q., Wang, Y.F., Ma, H., Zhu, E., Dong, L., Li, L., Li, X., Qiu, X., Tian, J., and Zheng, X., 2023. Development and application of membrane aerated biofilm reactor (MABR)-a review. Water, 15(3), p.436.

Lovibond® Water Testing, Tintometer® Group, 2019. Manual of Methods: Analytical procedures for Analysis of Water and Wastewater. Lovibond® Water Testing, Germany.

Muloiwa, M., Dinka, M., and Nyende-Byakika, S., 2022. Modelling and optimization of energy consumption in the activated sludge biological aeration Abed, A., Wahab, B., and Salman, A., 2024. Estimating the carbon footprint of civil electrical diesel generators in Baghdad City. The Iraqi Geological Journal, 57, pp.138-148.

Nabi Bid Hendi, G., Daryabeigi Zand, A., and Rabiee Abyaneh, M., 2021. Assessing the life-cycle greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of renewable and fossil fuel energy sources in Iran. Environmental Energy and Economic Research, 5, pp.1-9.

Okan, B., Erguder, T.H., and Aksoy, A., 2022. Plant-wide modeling of a metropolitan wastewater treatment plant to reduce energy consumption and carbon footprint. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30, pp.1606816080.

Ozturk, M.C., Martin Serrat, F., and Teymour, F., 2016. Optimization of aeration profiles in the activated sludge process. Chemical Engineering Science, 139, pp.1-14.

Rahimi, Y., Torabian, A., Mehrdadi, N., Habibi-Rezaie, M., Pezeshk, H., and Nabi-Bidhendi, G.R., 2011. Optimizing aeration rates for minimizing membrane fouling and its effect on sludge characteristics in a moving bed membrane bioreactor. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 186, pp.1097-1102.

Rice, E.W., Bridgewater, L., Association, A.P.H., Association, A.W.W., and Federation, W.E., ‎‎2012. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. American Public Health ‎Association, Washington, DC.

Robescu, L.D., Bondrea, A.D., Radosavlevici, I., and Stoicescu, A., 2018. Comparative study on sequential batch reactor and granular sequencing batch reactor. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2022, p.020021.

Shi, W., Satoh, H., and Mino, T., 2013. The effect of reduction of aeration period on organic pollutants removal in sequencing batch activated sludge reactors. Journal of Japan Society of Civil Engineers, Ser. G (Environmental Research), 69, pp.III_427-III_434.

Šikić, T., Welles, L., Rubio-Rincón, F.J., Matošić, M., and Brdjanovic, D., 2019.

Assessment of enhanced biological phosphorus removal implementation potential in a full-scale wastewater treatment plant in croatia. International Journal of Environmental Research, 13, pp.1005-1013.

Soliman, M., and Eldyasti, A., 2017. Long-term dynamic and pseudo-state modeling of complete partial nitrification process at high nitrogen loading rates in a sequential batch reactor (SBR). Bioresource Technology, 233, pp.382-390.

Tchobanoglous, G., Metcalf, E., Stensel, H.D., Tsuchihashi, R., Burton, F.L., Abu-Orf, M., Bowden, G., and Pfrang, W., 2014. Wastewater Engineering: Treatment and Resource Recovery. McGraw-Hill Education, United States.

Tyagi, R., Pandey, A., Drogui, P., Yadav, B., Pilli, S., and Wong, J., 2024. Decentralized Sanitation and Water Treatment: Concept and Technologies. CRC Press, United States.

Weiss, B., 2016. Evaluating the Anaerobic Codigestion Potential of Stillage and Dairy Manure in a Tubular Digester, Open Access Master’s Report, Michigan Technological University.

Published

2026-04-04

How to Cite

Hasan, D. N. and Mizzouri, N. S. (2026) “Optimization of Wastewater Aeration Time in Decentralized Sequencing Batch Reactors in Duhok City, Iraq”, ARO-THE SCIENTIFIC JOURNAL OF KOYA UNIVERSITY, 14(1), pp. 137–149. doi: 10.14500/aro.12487.
Received 2025-07-30
Accepted 2026-02-20
Published 2026-04-04

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.